Improving
Student Performance on Writing Assignments
Robb Sinn
North Georgia College &
State University
Email: rsinn@ngcsu.edu
Web Page: radar.ngcsu.edu/~rsinn
![]()
Reading _______________ Name
_________________________
|
Objective |
0 Pts |
1 Pt |
2 Pts |
3 Pts |
Total |
Earned |
Format
|
Not turned in. |
Did not follow formatting
instructions. |
Some formatting errors. |
Followed all formatting
instructions. |
3 |
|
|
Grammar |
Very poor, substandard
grammar. |
Many distracting grammatical
mistakes. |
Some distracting
grammatical mistakes. |
Very few grammatical
mistakes. |
3 |
|
|
Style |
Inadequate introduction or
conclusion. |
Strong
introduction-conclusion. |
Nicely themed. |
|
2 |
|
|
Completeness |
Not turned in. |
Several components
missing. |
Some components missing. |
All components present. |
3 |
|
|
Mathematics |
No mathematics
understanding demonstrated or serious usage errors. |
Incomplete mathematics
understanding or poor usage of mathematics terms. |
Strong mathematics
understanding and perfect usage of terms. |
|
2 |
|
|
Pedagogy |
No pedagogical
understanding demonstrated. |
Some pedagogical
understanding. |
Strong pedagogical
understanding. |
Complete pedagogical
understanding demonstrated |
3 |
|
|
CAP |
No analysis present. |
Good analysis. |
Superb analysis. |
|
2 |
|
|
Extra Mile |
No added effort apparent. |
Some extensions or
mathematical connections. |
Very creative extensions
or mathematical connections. |
|
2 |
|
|
Comments |
|
|
|
|
Total Points |
|
Linear Regression
Project: Score Sheet
Group Members
____________________________________
Grading Rubric
|
|||||
|
|
Below Standard |
Collegiate Quality |
Flawless Excellence |
|
|
|
Category |
1 Pt |
3 Pts |
5 Pts |
Possible |
Earned |
Presentation
|
|||||
|
Clarity, Poise & Timeliness |
Spoke hesitantly, lacked poise or did not finish
in time allotted |
Well-spoken, poised and within time allotted |
Polished, poised, timely and professional—adds to
class learning of statistics |
5 |
|
|
Technology |
Trouble with PPT file or graphics, distracting
colors or sounds, lacked coordination with speaker |
Good PPT slides, nice graphics and layout, good
teamwork with speaker |
Beautiful PPT colors, themes, graphics, layout,
teamwork—a pleasant and seamless visual experience |
5 |
|
|
Survey & Sampling |
Did not explain survey/sampling design, or did not
address representative sample |
Lucid discussion of survey/sampling design and
representative sample |
Added to class learning of statistics with strong
exposition of sampling and survey design and implementation |
5 |
|
|
Regression Analysis |
Failed to explain scatter-plot, r or line
of best fit correctly |
Explained scatter-plot, r and line of best
fit accurately |
In addition, explained R2 and an
example with prediction equation |
5 |
|
|
Overview of Research |
Failed to describe hypothesis or real world
context of results |
Adequately described hypothesis and real world
context of results |
Themed presentation complete with humor,
description of hypothesis and contextual analysis |
5 |
|
Overall Project
Implementation
|
|||||
|
Survey & Sampling |
Poorly designed, ill-described and awkwardly
executed |
Reasonable design, solid description and good
execution |
Exceptional design, description and implementation |
5 |
|
|
Statistical Analysis |
Failed to explain scatter-plot, r or line
of best fit correctly |
Explained scatter-plot, r and line of best
fit accurately |
In addition, explained R2 and an
example with prediction equation |
5 |
|
|
Demonstration of Learning |
No additional understanding demonstrated |
Clearly learned about real-world research |
Deepened understanding both of statistics and
subject studied |
5 |
|
|
Reflection Essay |
Lacking intro/conclusion, theme, anecdotes or good
grammar |
Readable, thematic with solid grammar |
Inspired essay: thematic, poignant, perfectly
written prose |
5 |
|
|
Understanding of Survey Research and Methods |
|||||
Teamwork |
Failed to communicate & work together |
Worked together & completed project reasonably
|
Strong teamwork and commitment to excellence
demonstrated |
5 |
|
|
Use of Templates |
Incomplete, hard to read and/or in multiple files |
Complete and in a single file |
Complete, single file with header and uniform
formatting |
5 |
|
|
Readability |
Many grammar errors and/or awkward sentences |
Few grammar and generally readable |
Beautifully written prose: good sentence structure
and spelling |
5 |
|
|
Technology |
Failure to complete PPT, DOC or XLS files |
Adequate use of PPT, XLS, DOC files and web-based
materials |
Sterling PPT presentation slides, solid graphics
and exceptional numerics in XLS files |
5 |
|
|
Extra Mile |
No additional effort or creativity demonstrated |
Some added effort or additional data collection or
analysis |
Additional regressions, larger sample, obvious
additional thoughtfulness and work. |
5 |
|
Grading Scale: 70 Points Possible
A 50-70 Points
B 40-49 Points
C 30-39 Points
D/F Less than 30
Points