Improving Student Performance on Writing Assignments

 

Robb Sinn

North Georgia College & State University

Email: rsinn@ngcsu.edu     Web Page: radar.ngcsu.edu/~rsinn

 

 

Reading _______________                                         Name _________________________

 

Mathematics Teaching Essays – Grading Rubric

Objective

0 Pts

1 Pt

2 Pts

3 Pts

Total

Earned

Format

Not turned in.

Did not follow formatting instructions.

Some formatting errors.

Followed all formatting instructions.

3

 

Grammar

Very poor, substandard grammar.

Many distracting grammatical mistakes.

Some distracting grammatical mistakes.

Very few grammatical mistakes.

3

 

Style

Inadequate introduction or conclusion.

Strong introduction-conclusion.

Nicely themed.

 

2

 

Completeness

Not turned in.

Several components missing.

Some components missing.

All components present.

3

 

Mathematics

No mathematics understanding demonstrated or serious usage errors.

Incomplete mathematics understanding or poor usage of mathematics terms.

Strong mathematics understanding and perfect usage of terms.

 

2

 

Pedagogy

No pedagogical understanding demonstrated.

Some pedagogical understanding.

Strong pedagogical understanding.

Complete pedagogical understanding demonstrated

3

 

CAP

No analysis present.

Good analysis.

Superb analysis.

 

2

 

Extra Mile

No added effort apparent.

Some extensions or mathematical connections.

Very creative extensions or mathematical connections.

 

2

 

Comments

 

 

 

 

Total

Points

 

 


Linear Regression Project: Score Sheet


Group Members

 

____________________________________           

 

 

 

 

Grading Rubric

 

Below Standard

Collegiate Quality

Flawless Excellence

 

 

Category

1 Pt

3 Pts

5 Pts

Possible

Earned

Presentation

Clarity, Poise & Timeliness

Spoke hesitantly, lacked poise or did not finish in time allotted

Well-spoken, poised and within time allotted

Polished, poised, timely and professional—adds to class learning of statistics

5

 

Technology

Trouble with PPT file or graphics, distracting colors or sounds, lacked coordination with speaker

Good PPT slides, nice graphics and layout, good teamwork with speaker

Beautiful PPT colors, themes, graphics, layout, teamwork—a pleasant and seamless visual experience

5

 

Survey & Sampling

Did not explain survey/sampling design, or did not address representative sample

Lucid discussion of survey/sampling design and representative sample

Added to class learning of statistics with strong exposition of sampling and survey design and implementation

5

 

Regression Analysis

Failed to explain scatter-plot, r or line of best fit correctly

Explained scatter-plot, r and line of best fit accurately

In addition, explained R2 and an example with prediction equation

5

 

Overview of Research

Failed to describe hypothesis or real world context of results

Adequately described hypothesis and real world context of results

Themed presentation complete with humor, description of hypothesis and contextual analysis

5

 

Overall Project Implementation

Survey & Sampling

Poorly designed, ill-described and awkwardly executed

Reasonable design, solid description and good execution

Exceptional design, description and implementation

5

 

Statistical Analysis

Failed to explain scatter-plot, r or line of best fit correctly

Explained scatter-plot, r and line of best fit accurately

In addition, explained R2 and an example with prediction equation

5

 

Demonstration of Learning

No additional understanding demonstrated

Clearly learned about real-world research

Deepened understanding both of statistics and subject studied

5

 

Reflection Essay

Lacking intro/conclusion, theme, anecdotes or good grammar

Readable, thematic with solid grammar

Inspired essay: thematic, poignant, perfectly written prose

5

 

Understanding of Survey Research and Methods

Teamwork

Failed to communicate & work together

Worked together & completed project reasonably

Strong teamwork and commitment to excellence demonstrated

5

 

Use of Templates

Incomplete, hard to read and/or in multiple files

Complete and in a single file

Complete, single file with header and uniform formatting

5

 

Readability

Many grammar errors and/or awkward sentences

Few grammar and generally readable

Beautifully written prose: good sentence structure and spelling

5

 

Technology

Failure to complete PPT, DOC or XLS files

Adequate use of PPT, XLS, DOC files and web-based materials

Sterling PPT presentation slides, solid graphics and exceptional numerics in XLS files

5

 

Extra Mile

No additional effort or creativity demonstrated

Some added effort or additional data collection or analysis

Additional regressions, larger sample, obvious additional thoughtfulness and work.

5

 

 

 

 


 

Grading Scale: 70 Points Possible

  A           50-70 Points

  B           40-49 Points

  C           30-39 Points

                  D/F       Less than 30 Points