Math Career Simulation Activity

 

Robb Sinn

North Georgia College & State University

Email: rsinn@ngcsu.edu     Web Page: radar.ngcsu.edu/~rsinn

 

Details and Grading Rubrics for Simulation Tasks

 

Students earn scholarship points by completing tasks in three categories: research, service and teaching.  The student’s evaluation score will be 40% research, 30% teaching and 30% service.  After two simulated years, a vita will be presented for pre-tenure review.  This evaluation will inform faculty of their progress toward promotion and tenure.  To achieve tenure, at least 600 scholarship points must be earned (725 for graduate students, 475 for non-math majors).  This would guarantee a faculty member of achieving tenure during promotion and tenure review and would result in at least a score of 84% for the mathematics career simulation portion of the Math 3590 grade.  These general categories of scholarship will earn grades as follows:

 

Promotion & Tenure Award

Course Grade

Tenure Awarded & Promoted to Rank of Full Professor

92 – 100%

Tenure Awarded & Promoted to Rank of Associate Professor

84 – 92%

Not Tenured but Promoted to Rank of Associate Professor

76 – 84%

Not Tenured & Not Promoted – Retain Rank of Asst. Professor

68 – 76%

Dismissed from university faculty

Less than 68%

 

Earning Scholarship Points

Max Possible Points

R

S

T

Published, peer-reviewed journal article

200

 

 

Conference presentation

25

 

100

Invited address

75

 

100

Journal editor

125

125

 

Conference organizer

 

150

 

Peer reviewer for journal article

 

40

 

Library resource gathering (articles, websites, texts)

 

20

 

Professional workshops conducted

 

 

50

 

Research Article Rubric – 50 Points

Category

Points Awarded

Comments

0

20

30

Status Awarded

Article rejected by journal editor

Article awarded “revise and resubmit” status initially, then published

Article awarded “accept with revisions” status and published

 

 

Depth of Insight

Writing demonstrates a profound understanding of concepts and why they are true and important.

0 – 6 Pts

 

 

Breadth of Insight

Writing demonstrates an understanding of how topic connects to other mathematics topics or consequences that extend to other disciplines or real-world phenomena.

0 – 6 Pts

 

 

Verification & Proof

Mathematical arguments are clean, precise and demonstrably true and correct; they utilize established techniques of proof and/or verification.

0 – 8 Pts

 

 

Multipliers

Level of Scholarship    1    2    3

 

 

 

Total Points Earned

 

 


 

Research Article Multiplier Table

Category

Description

Multiplier

Level 1

Described a method for solving a class of problems and demonstrated why proposed solution is valid.  Problem class solved is important to course objectives.

1

Level 2

Proved a major result from game theory, provided a counterexample to a conjecture, posed an interesting game or example worthy of consideration by other researchers.

2

Level 3

Prove or verified an especially important or difficult result, provided an especially exquisite game for other faculty to study.

3

 

Conference Presentation Rubric – 20 Points

Category

Points Awarded

Comments

0 – 1

2 – 3

4 – 5

Teaching

Communication & Clarity

Difficult to understand or hard to follow

Well understood only by certain groups or levels

Easily understood by an audience with a wide range of mathematics ability

 

Teaching

Precision

Several mathematics errors

Very few mathematics errors

No mathematics errors

 

Mathematics

Proof & Accuracy

One or more logic flaws – argument not valid

Minor errors or missed steps – no logic flaws

Complete demonstration, verification or proof

 

Mathematics Explanation

Lacking necessary pedagogical skill

Good pedagogical skill demonstrated

Truly exceptional pedagogical skill demonstrated

 

Total Points Earned

 

 

After the final presentation total is awarded, 20% of this total will be added to presenter’s research points.  Invited addresses will add an additional 50 points to the presenter’s research points regardless of total points awarded.

 

Oral Presentation Multiplier Table

Category

Description

Multiplier

Level 1

Solved a routine HW problem.

1

Level 2

Solved a class of HW problems and demonstrated solution method effectively enough for unit learning to occur.

2

Level 3

Solved an especially important, especially difficulty or especially large class of HW problems and demonstrated solution method effectively enough for unit learning to occur.

3

Additional Multiplier Units

Mathematics Connection

Problem or class of problems is connected well to other game theory ideas in this course.

+1

Beyond Mathematics Connection

Problem or class of problems is connected to other disciplines such as military, biology, economics, sports, social studies or some other real world problem or phenomenon.

+1

Invited Address

When a peer-reviewed journal article is of the highest quality, the author of the paper is often asked to give a presentation about it.  This “invited address” status is similar to a prestigious keynote address.

+50 Pts

Note: Our textbook has applications and connections listed for most problem types.  No connection multipliers will be given unless additional connections and/or applications are described in the presentation.

 

Total Points Awarded