Math Career Simulation
Activity
Robb Sinn
North Georgia College &
State University
Email: rsinn@ngcsu.edu Web
Page: radar.ngcsu.edu/~rsinn
Details and Grading Rubrics
for Simulation Tasks
Students earn scholarship points by
completing tasks in three categories: research, service and teaching. The student’s evaluation score will be 40%
research, 30% teaching and 30% service.
After two simulated years, a vita will be presented for pre-tenure
review. This evaluation will inform
faculty of their progress toward promotion and tenure. To achieve tenure, at least 600 scholarship points must be earned (725 for
graduate students, 475 for non-math majors).
This would guarantee a faculty member of achieving tenure during
promotion and tenure review and would result in at least a score of 84% for the
mathematics career simulation portion of the Math 3590 grade. These general categories of scholarship will
earn grades as follows:
|
Promotion & Tenure Award |
Course Grade |
|
Tenure Awarded & Promoted to Rank of Full
Professor |
92 –
100% |
|
Tenure Awarded & Promoted to Rank of Associate
Professor |
84 – 92% |
|
Not Tenured but Promoted to Rank of Associate
Professor |
76 – 84% |
|
Not Tenured & Not Promoted –
Retain Rank of Asst. Professor |
68 – 76% |
|
Dismissed from university faculty |
Less
than 68% |
Earning
Scholarship Points
|
Max Possible Points |
||
|
R |
S |
T |
|
|
Published, peer-reviewed journal article |
200 |
|
|
|
Conference presentation |
25 |
|
100 |
|
Invited address |
75 |
|
100 |
|
Journal editor |
125 |
125 |
|
|
Conference organizer |
|
150 |
|
|
Peer reviewer for journal article |
|
40 |
|
|
Library resource gathering (articles, websites, texts) |
|
20 |
|
|
Professional workshops conducted |
|
|
50 |
Research Article
Rubric – 50 Points
|
|||||
Category
|
Points
Awarded |
Comments
|
|||
|
0 |
20 |
30 |
|||
Status Awarded
|
Article
rejected by journal editor |
Article
awarded “revise and resubmit” status initially, then published |
Article
awarded “accept with revisions” status and published |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Depth of
Insight |
Writing
demonstrates a profound understanding of concepts and why they are true and
important. |
0 – 6
Pts |
|
|
|
|
Breadth
of Insight |
Writing
demonstrates an understanding of how topic connects to other mathematics
topics or consequences that extend to other disciplines or real-world
phenomena. |
0 – 6
Pts |
|
|
|
|
Verification
& Proof |
Mathematical
arguments are clean, precise and demonstrably true and correct; they utilize
established techniques of proof and/or verification. |
0 – 8
Pts |
|
|
|
|
Multipliers |
Level of
Scholarship 1 2
3 |
|
|
|
|
Total
Points Earned
|
|
||||
Research Article
Multiplier Table
|
||
|
Category |
Description |
Multiplier |
|
Level 1 |
Described
a method for solving a class of problems and
demonstrated why proposed solution is valid.
Problem class solved is important to course objectives. |
1 |
|
Level 2 |
Proved a
major result from game theory, provided a counterexample to a conjecture,
posed an interesting game or example worthy of consideration by other
researchers. |
2 |
|
Level 3 |
Prove or
verified an especially important or difficult result, provided an especially
exquisite game for other faculty to study. |
3 |
Conference
Presentation Rubric – 20 Points
|
||||
Category
|
Points
Awarded |
Comments
|
||
|
0 – 1 |
2 – 3 |
4 – 5 |
||
Teaching
Communication
& Clarity
|
Difficult
to understand or hard to follow |
Well
understood only by certain groups or levels |
Easily
understood by an audience with a wide range of mathematics ability |
|
Teaching
Precision |
Several
mathematics errors |
Very few
mathematics errors |
No
mathematics errors |
|
Mathematics
Proof
& Accuracy |
One or
more logic flaws – argument not valid |
Minor
errors or missed steps – no logic flaws |
Complete
demonstration, verification or proof |
|
|
Mathematics
Explanation |
Lacking
necessary pedagogical skill |
Good
pedagogical skill demonstrated |
Truly
exceptional pedagogical skill demonstrated |
|
Total
Points Earned
|
|
|||
After the final presentation total is awarded, 20% of this
total will be added to presenter’s research points. Invited addresses will add an additional 50 points to the
presenter’s research points regardless of total points awarded.
Oral
Presentation Multiplier Table
|
||
|
Category |
Description |
Multiplier |
|
Level 1 |
Solved a
routine HW problem. |
1 |
|
Level 2 |
Solved a
class of HW problems and demonstrated solution method
effectively enough for unit learning to occur. |
2 |
|
Level 3 |
Solved
an especially important, especially difficulty or especially large class
of HW problems and demonstrated solution method effectively enough for unit
learning to occur. |
3 |
Additional
Multiplier Units
|
||
|
Mathematics
Connection |
Problem
or class of problems is connected well to other game theory ideas in this
course. |
+1 |
|
Beyond
Mathematics Connection |
Problem
or class of problems is connected to other disciplines such as military,
biology, economics, sports, social studies or some other real world problem
or phenomenon. |
+1 |
|
Invited
Address |
When a
peer-reviewed journal article is of the highest quality, the author of the
paper is often asked to give a presentation about it. This “invited address” status is similar
to a prestigious keynote address. |
+50 Pts |
|
Note:
Our textbook has applications and connections listed for most problem types. No connection multipliers will be given
unless additional connections and/or applications are
described in the presentation. |
|
|
Total
Points Awarded
|
|
|