Lake Lanier Water Quality Trend Monitoring              
    Samples taken August 19, 1999            
                 
      Field Measurements          
      Air Water   Conduct. Cond @25°C  
Station Name Time Temp °C Temp °C pH micromhos/cm micromhos/cm D.O. mg/l
1 Balus Cr. 1522 37 25 7.51 100 99 9.1
2 Flat Cr. 1535 38 29 7.47 900 834 8.0
3 Limestone Cr. 1453 33 32 7.97 70 61 9.4
4 Chatt. R. 1430 35 30 7.04 42 37 8.2
5 Little R. 1405 35 27 7.26 57 54 9.1
6 Wahoo Cr. 1332 38 26 7.43 60 58 10.5
7 Squirrel Cr. 1348 32 32 8.54 52 45 9.1
8 Chestatee R. 1305 32 27 7.35 38 36 9.3
9 Six Mile Cr. 1625 34 25 7.09 233 232 8.5
10 Buford Dam Splw* 1655 35 13 6.63 26 34 4.9
11 Bolling Bridge 1600 36 31 7.73 41 35 8.5
    * Water being released through turbines at Buford Dam            
                 
      Lab Measurements          
    Fecal col. BOD5 TSS   Hardness Alkalinity COD
Station Name cfb/100ml mg/l mg/l Turb NTU mg/l CaCO3 mg/l CaCO3 mg/l
1 Balus Cr. 840 1.1 2.0 7.4 52 40 19.2
2 Flat Cr. 42300 1.6 3.2 2.1 186 58 19.2
3 Limestone Cr. 560 1.8 8.6 9.3 32 24 15.4
4 Chatt. R. 20 0.9 10.2 9.0 24 13 15.4
5 Little R. 560 0.7 5.2 5.6 26 19 23.0
6 Wahoo Cr. 2420 0.4 1.2 6.1 30 24 15.4
7 Squirrel Cr. 180 1.8 7.0 5.3 26 18 7.7
8 Chestatee R. 220 1.2 4.4 9.0 24 14 7.7
9 Six Mile Cr. 7580 2.2 3.4 4.6 32 15 7.7
10 Buford Dam Splwy 20 0.6 1.0 1.5 24 13 3.8
11 Bolling Bridge 80 0.7 2.2 2.1 24 14 3.8

Last Updated on 4/13/01
By Robert C. Fuller
Email: rcfuller@ngcsu.edu